00:17:51	E11:	I thought wed finished 35
00:19:49	E21:	Yes agree with E12
00:23:04	E11:	there is also likelihood of collection containing third party content where conditions may be less clear
00:25:27	E02:	yes, thank you... was just going to write that
00:25:43	E22:	thanks E14 I agree
00:26:50	E09:	That was my thinking as well
00:27:02	E10:	It depends who did the digitising again
00:33:43	E19:	i agree with E07
00:34:06	E11:	E07 I agree, many might also look to avoid redaction unless they were forced / required to
00:35:13	E02:	yup
00:35:28	E02:	sometimes that all you can do or admit to it
00:35:30	E16:	I have heard of tools that can redact, I have used paint before to blank our parts of drawings...but how many other archivists would know that I am not sure so I was uncertain
00:37:39	E22:	I agree I looked at the whole organisation and our commitment to transparency
00:38:37	E10:	How many archives are public sector institutions and therefore subject to FOI etc?
00:42:15	E10:	Yes, agree E07 not consistent or automated necessarily
00:43:45	E13:	I assumed you were digitising it to make it available
00:43:50	E21:	I went higher as it was probably digitised to make availability easier.
00:44:29	E09:	That was my feeling as well, likely digitised to be made available via some platform
00:48:37	E09:	I would of thought this is higher than theft, but theft would be highlighted more
00:49:12	E01:	I think you need to take the two questions together so that both categories don't add up to more than say 80%   Experience in the council suggests both these categories are very common,
00:50:39	E06:	yes, that's how I approached it
00:51:22	E19:	things i'd include as 'non-cyber security incidents' would include things like anti-social behaviour on site, theft/attempted theft on non-archival assets etc. i think those two combined would be higher than specific theft of e.g archival material
00:55:20	E12:	Thank you!
00:55:26	E16:	thank you